Have a look into the Testing/Java directory for examples of java programs using the GNUstep core libraries. Some of the examples from there will now be also made available here.
No. JIGS requires JNI 1.2, mainly because it uses weak references, which are provided by JNI 1.2 but not by JNI 1.1. There are no current plans to port JIGS to JNI 1.1.
Yes! That is a well-tested scenario. Here are a few hints: you need to make sure that:
If you run GNUstep from java, it will always read its process name as 'java'. This is nothing bad, except that all user defaults for java applications would be saved under the name 'java', and mix one with the other. To workaround this, you just need to set the process name of your process at the beginning of your code. Something like:
(NSProcessInfo.processInfo ()).setProcessName ("myApp");
See question 3. - it's the same problem with the same solution.
JIGS's implementation is - at present - quite deeply dependent on the GNU Objective-C runtime.
In general, JIGS should be as portable as GNUstep and the GNU Objective-C runtime - wherever you can run the GNUstep base library with the GNU Objective-C runtime compiled as shared you should also be able to run JIGS (assuming you have a JDK 1.2 environment). This means once the GNUstep base library is ported (even without working Distributed Objects), JIGS should be ported as well - and if not, at least it should be possible to port it without particular hassle.
This is the theory - in practice, up to now I only have reports of JIGS running on GNU/Linux i386 and GNU/Linux ppc. If you have experiences running (or trying to run) JIGS on a different machine and os, I (Nicola Pero) would be happy to hear about your experience.
The base library is wrapped, and works nicely. The gui library wrapper instead is experimental and hackish and not very useful as it stands.
The best way to submit bug reports and fixes is to follow the guidelines for reporting GNUstep bugs described on the GNUstep Wiki or on the general GNUstep web site.